I used to be afraid of bats. I don’t know why. I’d never found one roosting in my attic or even seen one from afar. Maybe it was because they hang upside down (why?) or skulk about in the dark. Then an article in my alumni magazine began to change my perception of these small flying mammals, and the Little Brown Bat gave me an idea for a new sensory writing exercise.
Bats navigate using a sixth sense called echolocation, a kind of built-in sonar system. A bat will send a high-pitched sound wave, far too high for humans to detect, which bounces off objects in the environment. The bat can determine the distance, shape, and speed of that object based on how quickly the sound wave returns to its ears. It doesn’t need to see or touch the object to get any additional information. If that object is a tasty moth, the bat is on it in seconds, even though the moth is a more adept flier.*
Bat Walk
I decided to expand my newfound appreciation by going on a bat walk in Central Park. A small group of us met on a footbridge at dusk guided by scientists from the American Museum of Natural History. We watched the surface of the pond for any bats that might leave their roost under the bridge but nothing. I squinted and stared intently at one fixed spot, hoping a bat would move through my field of vision. I didn’t know for sure they were there.
Luckily the scientists had brought technology with them—a device that converted the high pitch echolocation waves to a frequency we can hear. And suddenly bats were all around us, their signals pulsing like bird chirps faster or slower as their navigated around trees and us. When they zeroed in on an insect, the chirps became one continuous sound until they caught their prey. Then silence for a few beats until they moved on. They were using an ability I don’t have and cannot fully appreciate.
See it to believe it
The bats reminded me that just because we can’t see something doesn’t mean it isn’t there. Of course we know this, but we often forget it in our writing.
We humans rely so heavily on sight that it’s easy to undervalue the other senses. Or maybe not undervalue them, but certainly relegate them in importance. On the page, we translate events as we see them in our mind’s eye: the school bus pulls up to the stop, the doors open, little Janie hops down the steps to the ground. What about the squeal of the brakes? The smell of exhaust fumes? The grit of gravel between your teeth as the bus kicks up the dusty road?
If, like me, you have to be reminded to utilize all of your senses in your stories, consider yourself reminded! And if you need a little practice, try keeping a Sensory Journal.
Carry a small notebook with you. (You can also use your phone, but I find paper and pen is the best method.) As you go through your day, record anything that excites your senses other than sight: touch, taste, smell, sound. Close your eyes if you can and let your other senses take over for a moment. It can be a few words to a few sentences — just be sure to capture it in the moment rather than waiting until later. Aim for at least three entries each day.
This exercise helps reconnect you with all of your senses and will encourage you to look for opportunities to incorporate these types of sensory descriptions in your story.
*For those of you who are curious…some species of moths have evolved a way to “jam” a bat’s echolocation frequency. This confuses the bat for a few seconds, just long enough for the moth to evade capture.
Musings
- I’ve been catching up on a few podcasts and here are two that I’ve found interesting:
- Revisionist History by Malcolm Gladwell Each episode focuses on a person, place or event from the past and examines if the story we tell ourselves about it is the right one.
- Undiscovered This show combines science, history, and storytelling to dig into the backstories of science. Did you know Kurt Vonnegut’s brother was a top scientist researching ways (some good and some not so good) to control the weather? Kurt wrote several stories around this theme.
- Have you read a book and came to a very different conclusion than most other reviewers? I recently had that experience when writing a book review for Anna and the Swallow Man, a YA novel set in 1939 Krakow. Many folks on Goodreads did not connect with this story. “Seriously, I don’t get this book.” “This book is confused.” One reviewer said that it left her “ultimately very frustrated.” I think they were reading the events of the story in a literal sense, but I thought the story was an allegory. Here is my review on Goodreads. If so many readers misinterpret the author’s intention, is that on the author or the reader? Let me know what you think.
- I’ve been working hard to create my new online class: Writing About Place: Five Days to Immersive Setting. The class is going to be a deep dive into writing about setting, which applies to fiction and narrative nonfiction alike. In five days, we’ll cover all the important details and you’ll get helpful, personal exercises. If you (or someone you know) are interested, sign up for my newsletter. I’ll be opening registration to newsletter subscribers first.
Bats do get kind of a bad rap, probably because of the Dracula movies and fears about getting rabies. But they give me the creeps.
Austin, Texas has the largest urban bat colony in N. America, and you can watch hundreds of thousands of them at dusk for several months. I’ve been to Austin many times, but chose to skip the bat-watching.
I think I’m the only one who really disliked Cold Mountain. Just didn’t get the appeal.
I’ve heard about the bat cave in Austin. Before my bat walk in Central Park, I probably would have been too nervous to go near that cave. I was afraid that the bats would fly into me, but now I think I might go. 🙂 Their echolocation is sophisticated enough to easily avoid things that are not dinner. Though the scientists mentioned one thing does trip them up — smooth surfaces like glass or metal. They think those surfaces cause the echolocation signals to “slide,” causing the bats to get confused and run into the building.
Great suggestion, Jackie, to keep a sensory journal. I read once that writers often overlook smells in their descriptions. The olefactory sense is so powerful. I try to use it when I can. I’m not a lover of bats, either, but I respect them. We used to live next door to a place where bats nested in the chimney. (I guess they liked it since it was a summer house and the fireplace was rarely used!) At twilight, they’d come flying out of the chimney by the dozens. An eerie, but beautiful sight.
I had a professor introduce me to a sensory journal and it was one of my favorite exercises. I am amazed at how easy it is to tune out my other senses. Maybe it’s a self-preservation thing when you live in NYC! 🙂
I like the idea of keeping a sensory journal. I carry a notebook with me but I need to get better at actually writing my observations down. You inspire me to be more present with my thoughts and to actually strive to take pen to paper.
I wish I could have seen the bats
You’re so good at capturing intriguing and powerful images in your poems! I had no doubt that you carry a notebook with you.
My memory is so shot that I find if I don’t write it down in the moment, it’s gone immediately. For example, I can’t even remember what I had for breakfast this morning. 🙂
This sounds like so much fun! I love the sensory journal suggestion. I will try that. My parents had a bat setting up house in their patio umbrella, so I bought them a bat house. 🙂
This exercise stemmed from a semester-long project assigned by one of my professors. It was one of my favorite assignments. We also kept notes on any emotions we had relating to these experiences. That alone was a gold mine! 🙂
I usually have the opposite problem with reviews. People rave and say thinks like “stunning” and “breathtaking.” And I’m like, “it was okay.”
Oh, I’ve had that experience too. 😉
And sometimes I’ll second-guess myself. Did I miss something?